Beyond payout: a full HRMS?
RazorpayX Payroll automates the pay-out and compliance mechanics with the polish you would expect from a payments company. The question this page answers: what changes when payroll is one part of an HR platform rather than an extension of banking.
Payments-first versus people-first
RazorpayX Payroll approaches payroll from the payments side — execution, disbursal and compliance automation tightly coupled to banking rails, a genuinely convenient shape for small teams whose payroll is simple and whose pain is the paying part. PeopleDeck approaches the same month from the people side: attendance and leave feed computation, onboarding and exits are lifecycle events with checklists and computed FnF, and the payslip carries its full working. Both automate compliance; the difference is whether the system's model of your company is a payout list or a workforce.
How to run this evaluation
Ask where your errors and hours actually come from. If payroll inputs are trivially simple (same salaries monthly, no shifts, rare exits) a payout-centric tool may be all you need; verify current scope on Razorpay's pages. If the month involves attendance, variable pay, joiners and leavers, or audits, test how each product handles the input side, because disbursal was never the hard part. PeopleDeck's free start lets you run the whole path on your own data.
The side-by-side, honestly
Concrete claims below are about PeopleDeck only. For the other column, we state category facts and what to verify. Products change, so check current details on their own pages before you decide.
| Dimension | PeopleDeck | RazorpayX Payroll; verify on their pages |
|---|---|---|
| Product shape | One platform for payroll, attendance, leave, onboarding to FnF, records and self-service, bought self-serve by any business | Payroll and payout automation from the Razorpay ecosystem, banking-coupled; verify current HR-side scope |
| Payroll & statutory | PF, ESI, PT and TDS applied on every payslip; upload-ready ECR and return files generated. Filing stays with you | Compliance automation is core to their pitch; verify current statutory coverage and filing model for your case |
| Pricing model | Per employee, per month, in ₹. Whole platform included, rate shown transparently at sign-up, start free | Check their current published pricing, no claim made here |
| Attendance & leave | Rosters, rotating shifts, biometric, web and mobile punches; attendance feeds payroll directly | Verify what attendance and leave capability exists versus what your month needs |
| Onboarding to exit | Joining checklists to a computed full-and-final statement with every line's working shown | Verify onboarding depth and how FnF computation handles your exit cases |
| Self-service | Payslips, balances, declarations, claims and Form 16 data in every employee's hands | Employee app offered; verify scope beyond payslip delivery |
| Getting started | Self-serve sign-up; import employees, run a parallel month, go live when it reconciles | Self-serve start available; verify setup for your structures and states |
What switchers say they were actually looking for
-
1
The month is bigger than the transfer
Computing what to pay (from attendance, shifts, arrears, exits) is where payroll gets hard and where disputes are born. Teams that outgrow payout tools usually outgrow the input side first.
-
2
An audit trail about people, not just payments
Wage registers, contribution histories and settlement statements are workforce records. When an inspection or diligence lands, the question is rarely 'were transfers made'; it is 'do the records reconcile'.
-
3
Banking freedom
A payroll platform should produce a bank file your bank consumes — any bank. Coupling payroll to one banking stack is convenient until your banking decisions want to be independent of your HR decisions.
PeopleDeck in depth: the payroll engine · statutory compliance · per-employee pricing
Migrating without a bad payday
Migration from a payout-centric tool means building the input layer you did not have: import the employee master, define structures explicitly (often the first time they are written down), encode leave and attendance policy, and carry year-to-date statutory figures as opening balances.
Run the parallel month against the current tool's outputs. Expect the reconciliation to surface not errors so much as absences — allowances that were never itemised, balances that were never tracked. Go live on a month boundary with the records you were missing now accumulating by default.
The boundary that decides it
PeopleDeck is a standalone HRMS any business signs up for, priced per employee, per month, with PF, ESI, professional tax and TDS applied to every payslip and upload-ready return files generated, never filed behind your back. If you are an education institution comparing ERP-bundled payroll instead, that is a different product shape: see SchoolDeck staff payroll for schools or CampusAlly payroll for colleges, licensed per institution.
Frequently asked questions
Is RazorpayX Payroll a bad product?
No; it is a well-regarded payout-and-compliance automation for simple payrolls, actively maintained. This page exists because teams outgrow the shape, not because the shape is wrong.
What exactly do we gain in the switch?
The input layer: attendance and leave feeding computation, onboarding checklists, computed FnF, itemised payslips, and workforce records that satisfy audits. Disbursal you already had.
Do we lose the banking convenience?
You gain portability: PeopleDeck generates transfer files your bank (any bank) processes, so payroll stops assuming a banking stack. If tight coupling to Razorpay rails is your priority, verify that trade-off honestly.
Can we keep using Razorpay for payments elsewhere?
Of course. This is a payroll decision, not a payments one. Your payment gateway and your HRMS are separate choices, which is rather the point.
What should we verify on their side?
Current HR-side scope (attendance, leave, exits), statutory filing model, and pricing, on Razorpay's own current pages. Their product evolves; only their material is authoritative.
Payroll that knows your people, not just their accounts.
Run a parallel month on your own data — the reconciliation decides, not the brochure.
Start free