Desktop-era payroll, or cloud-native?
Saral PayPack comes from the desktop era of Indian payroll and remains a serious statutory product, today offered across desktop, on-premise and cloud. The comparison here is architectural: what changes when payroll is cloud-native rather than cloud-also.
A respectful comparison across generations
Saral PayPack (Relyon) has served Indian payroll for a long time, with deep statutory roots, and to be accurate: it now offers desktop, on-premise and cloud deployments, so this is not a simple desktop-versus-cloud caricature; verify the current deployment options and their feature parity on Relyon's pages. PeopleDeck's difference is being cloud-native from the first line: no installation anywhere, self-service as a given, every user (HR, approvers, employees, your CA) on the same live system, and updates (statutory rates included) arriving without anyone patching software.
How to run this evaluation
If you run their desktop edition today, list what the desktop shape costs you: the machine payroll depends on, the backup discipline, the one person who has the software, employees asking HR for payslips. If you are comparing their cloud edition, compare cloud-native depth against ported depth (approval flows, mobile punches, live multi-user work) case by case on current material. Then run PeopleDeck's free parallel month from any browser, which is itself the demonstration.
The side-by-side, honestly
Concrete claims below are about PeopleDeck only. For the other column, we state category facts and what to verify. Products change, so check current details on their own pages before you decide.
| Dimension | PeopleDeck | Saral PayPack; verify on their pages |
|---|---|---|
| Product shape | One platform for payroll, attendance, leave, onboarding to FnF, records and self-service, bought self-serve by any business | Long-standing Indian payroll product offered desktop, on-premise and cloud; verify edition parity for your needs |
| Payroll & statutory | PF, ESI, PT and TDS applied on every payslip; upload-ready ECR and return files generated. Filing stays with you | Statutory depth is their heritage; verify current coverage and formats in the edition you would run |
| Pricing model | Per employee, per month, in ₹. Whole platform included, rate shown transparently at sign-up, start free | Licence and edition-based models published; check current terms; no claim made here |
| Attendance & leave | Rosters, rotating shifts, biometric, web and mobile punches; attendance feeds payroll directly | Attendance offered; verify capture options and how they reach the run in your edition |
| Onboarding to exit | Joining checklists to a computed full-and-final statement with every line's working shown | Verify lifecycle scope and FnF depth in the edition you would run |
| Self-service | Payslips, balances, declarations, claims and Form 16 data in every employee's hands | ESS portal offered; verify scope in your edition versus a cloud-native default |
| Getting started | Self-serve sign-up; import employees, run a parallel month, go live when it reconciles | Installation or provisioning per edition; verify setup path with their team |
What switchers say they were actually looking for
-
1
Payroll that lives nowhere in particular
Cloud-native means payroll is not on a machine: no installation to maintain, no backup ritual, no single desk it depends on. The month runs from any browser, approved from a phone if that is where you are.
-
2
Everyone on the live system
Self-service, manager approvals and consultant access are native when the architecture assumes many users: payslips reach phones, approvals happen in-flow, your CA reviews generated files directly.
-
3
Updates as a service
Statutory rates and formats change; cloud-native means they change centrally, with effect dates, without a patch cycle. Ask any vendor how the last rate change reached their desktop installations.
PeopleDeck in depth: the payroll engine · statutory compliance · per-employee pricing
Migrating without a bad payday
Migration from a desktop-era product is mostly extraction: get masters, structures, balances and year-to-date figures out (their export tooling and your consultant both help), import via validated sheets, and encode policies into rules the system enforces rather than documents people follow.
Run the parallel month, reconcile payslip by payslip: statutory products of Saral's vintage compute well, so expect differences to be policy interpretation, not arithmetic, and go live on a month boundary. Retire the desktop machine's payroll role gently: keep it as archive until the audit cycle passes.
The boundary that decides it
PeopleDeck is a standalone HRMS any business signs up for, priced per employee, per month, with PF, ESI, professional tax and TDS applied to every payslip and upload-ready return files generated, never filed behind your back. If you are an education institution comparing ERP-bundled payroll instead, that is a different product shape: see SchoolDeck staff payroll for schools or CampusAlly payroll for colleges, licensed per institution.
Frequently asked questions
Is desktop payroll software actually worse?
Not at computing — mature desktop products compute Indian payroll well. The costs are architectural: single-machine dependency, backup discipline, update cycles, and everyone who isn't at that machine working through exports. Price those, not the arithmetic.
Saral PayPack has cloud editions too, so why PeopleDeck?
Then the comparison is cloud-native versus cloud-offered: test approval flows, mobile capture, multi-user live work and self-service depth side by side on current material. Born-cloud architecture tends to show in exactly those seams.
How does our data leave a desktop system?
Standard exports plus your consultant's working files cover masters, structures and year-to-date statutory figures. Plan one afternoon with whoever runs the desktop today; the parallel month validates the rest.
What about data safety without our own machine?
India-hosted infrastructure, role-scoped access, complete export rights at any time, and no single hard disk whose failure is your payroll history. Verify any vendor's hosting and export posture in writing, ours included.
What should we verify on Relyon's side?
Edition-by-edition feature parity, current statutory coverage, and how updates reach your deployment, from their current pages and team.
Payroll without a machine to maintain.
Run a parallel month on your own data — the reconciliation decides, not the brochure.
Start free